<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (10) TMI 201 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152752</link>
    <description>Under the Cement Control Order, freight formed part of the sale price within section 2(h) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, because the control regime made freight an integral element of the sale transaction. On that basis, freight was includible in the taxable turnover. The Court applied the same legal position previously settled by its earlier decision and upheld inclusion of freight in the appellant&#039;s turnover.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2020 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (10) TMI 201 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152752</link>
      <description>Under the Cement Control Order, freight formed part of the sale price within section 2(h) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, because the control regime made freight an integral element of the sale transaction. On that basis, freight was includible in the taxable turnover. The Court applied the same legal position previously settled by its earlier decision and upheld inclusion of freight in the appellant&#039;s turnover.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>