<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (8) TMI 191 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152737</link>
    <description>The court determined that an air blowing instrument qualifies as &quot;machinery&quot; under a specific sales tax notification, subjecting it to a 6% tax rate instead of the 2% rate claimed by the assessee. Relying on precedents defining machinery to include instruments transmitting and modifying power, force, and motion, the court concluded that the air blowing instrument falls within this definition. The decision clarifies the scope of machinery under the notification, highlighting that even simple appliances can be considered machinery if they meet the criteria of transmitting energy or force. The court overturned the revising authority&#039;s decision and imposed costs on the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 15:49:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169774" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (8) TMI 191 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152737</link>
      <description>The court determined that an air blowing instrument qualifies as &quot;machinery&quot; under a specific sales tax notification, subjecting it to a 6% tax rate instead of the 2% rate claimed by the assessee. Relying on precedents defining machinery to include instruments transmitting and modifying power, force, and motion, the court concluded that the air blowing instrument falls within this definition. The decision clarifies the scope of machinery under the notification, highlighting that even simple appliances can be considered machinery if they meet the criteria of transmitting energy or force. The court overturned the revising authority&#039;s decision and imposed costs on the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>