<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 926 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152711</link>
    <description>Surface miners were analysed for classification under Heading 84.30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, with the appellate view that goods falling under that heading were excluded from capital goods credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal accepted the classification of the surface miner under Heading 84.30 and, on that basis, upheld denial of MODVAT credit. The appeal therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 13:21:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 926 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152711</link>
      <description>Surface miners were analysed for classification under Heading 84.30 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, with the appellate view that goods falling under that heading were excluded from capital goods credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal accepted the classification of the surface miner under Heading 84.30 and, on that basis, upheld denial of MODVAT credit. The appeal therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>