https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152703 Section 107 of the Wakf Act, 1995 was held not to operate retrospectively so as to revive a wakf property suit already barred under the Limitation Act, 1908. The Court held that Article 134-B of the 1908 Act applied because the limitation period had expired before the Limitation Act, 1963 commenced, and Section 31 of the 1963 Act prevented institution of a suit where time had already run out. Section 112 of the Wakf Act was treated as a saving provision, not an express revival of extinguished rights. The barred claim remained time-barred, and the appellants succeeded. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2013 12:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152703 Section 107 of the Wakf Act, 1995 was held not to operate retrospectively so as to revive a wakf property suit already barred under the Limitation Act, 1908. The Court held that Article 134-B of the 1908 Act applied because the limitation period had expired before the Limitation Act, 1963 commenced, and Section 31 of the 1963 Act prevented institution of a suit where time had already run out. Section 112 of the Wakf Act was treated as a saving provision, not an express revival of extinguished rights. The barred claim remained time-barred, and the appellants succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152703