<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 958 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152700</link>
    <description>Deodorants containing denatured alcohol were treated as falling outside the claimed Chapter 33 exclusion because the product&#039;s ingredients showed non-potable alcohol intended for industrial use. Chapter Note 33(1)(d) and Section 2 of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 were applied to distinguish perfumery and toilet preparations containing alcohol by reference to the statutory meaning of alcohol. The presence of denatured alcohol indicated that the goods were not fit for human consumption, so the duty treatment applicable to alcoholic preparations not potable in nature was maintained and the classification in the impugned order was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 958 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152700</link>
      <description>Deodorants containing denatured alcohol were treated as falling outside the claimed Chapter 33 exclusion because the product&#039;s ingredients showed non-potable alcohol intended for industrial use. Chapter Note 33(1)(d) and Section 2 of the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 were applied to distinguish perfumery and toilet preparations containing alcohol by reference to the statutory meaning of alcohol. The presence of denatured alcohol indicated that the goods were not fit for human consumption, so the duty treatment applicable to alcoholic preparations not potable in nature was maintained and the classification in the impugned order was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>