<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 785 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152692</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant exemption under section 10(10C) to the assessee, a retired employee of the Reserve Bank of India. The Court emphasized adherence to monetary limits for filing appeals and the binding nature of circulars when the tax effect is below the specified threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:11:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 785 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152692</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision to grant exemption under section 10(10C) to the assessee, a retired employee of the Reserve Bank of India. The Court emphasized adherence to monetary limits for filing appeals and the binding nature of circulars when the tax effect is below the specified threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>