<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1002 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152691</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal, setting aside the order crediting the amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. The refund of Rs. 2,60,498 claimed by the importer for goods cleared under certain Bills of Entry was sanctioned as the goods were supplied free of cost as warranty replacements, and the duty incidence was not passed on to customers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 11:09:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1002 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152691</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal, setting aside the order crediting the amount to the Consumer Welfare Fund. The refund of Rs. 2,60,498 claimed by the importer for goods cleared under certain Bills of Entry was sanctioned as the goods were supplied free of cost as warranty replacements, and the duty incidence was not passed on to customers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>