<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1004 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152685</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was held unsustainable where invoices were issued without actual supply of goods. The invoices carried a vehicle description inconsistent with the quantities shown, and the supplier&#039;s proprietor stated that only invoices were issued and no goods were dispatched; those statements were not retracted. On those facts, the transaction was treated as fraudulent and the demand, interest, and penalty were upheld. The same fraud and suppression of material facts also justified invocation of the extended limitation period, so the limitation objection failed and the adjudication order was restored in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 10:35:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1004 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152685</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was held unsustainable where invoices were issued without actual supply of goods. The invoices carried a vehicle description inconsistent with the quantities shown, and the supplier&#039;s proprietor stated that only invoices were issued and no goods were dispatched; those statements were not retracted. On those facts, the transaction was treated as fraudulent and the demand, interest, and penalty were upheld. The same fraud and suppression of material facts also justified invocation of the extended limitation period, so the limitation objection failed and the adjudication order was restored in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>