https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152682 The Tribunal found that the Appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for the denial of Cenvat credit, directing them to deposit a specified amount within six weeks. The waiver of the remaining pre-deposit and stay on recovery were contingent on compliance with this directive. The judgment addressed issues related to the waiver of pre-deposit, correct classification of goods for Cenvat credit eligibility, the application of a longer limitation period, and the establishment of a prima facie case for granting waiver. en-us Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 May 2017 09:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152682 The Tribunal found that the Appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for the denial of Cenvat credit, directing them to deposit a specified amount within six weeks. The waiver of the remaining pre-deposit and stay on recovery were contingent on compliance with this directive. The judgment addressed issues related to the waiver of pre-deposit, correct classification of goods for Cenvat credit eligibility, the application of a longer limitation period, and the establishment of a prima facie case for granting waiver. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152682