https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152651 A claimant's right to seek enhanced compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 depends on a valid and timely reference under Section 18, because written application within limitation and compliance with Section 18(2) are conditions precedent to the civil court's jurisdiction. A reference made by one co-sharer for his own share does not automatically extend to other co-sharers, especially where compensation was separately apportioned and no timely application was made on their behalf. Section 53 does not attract Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure where the statutory procedure is inconsistent. On that basis, a co-sharer who did not seek reference could not claim enhancement. en-us Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Aug 2013 12:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152651 A claimant's right to seek enhanced compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 depends on a valid and timely reference under Section 18, because written application within limitation and compliance with Section 18(2) are conditions precedent to the civil court's jurisdiction. A reference made by one co-sharer for his own share does not automatically extend to other co-sharers, especially where compensation was separately apportioned and no timely application was made on their behalf. Section 53 does not attract Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure where the statutory procedure is inconsistent. On that basis, a co-sharer who did not seek reference could not claim enhancement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152651