<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 279 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152630</link>
    <description>In best judgment assessment, the assessing authority must act honestly and comply with natural justice by disclosing all material proposed to be used against the assessee and giving an effective opportunity to rebut it. Material privately collected by the department cannot lawfully form the basis of an ex parte assessment unless it is first brought to the assessee&#039;s notice. The assessee&#039;s non-cooperation does not remove this obligation, because the authority can still communicate the material and proceed after a fair response opportunity. The HC therefore held the assessment invalid to the extent it rested on undisclosed material.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:19:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 279 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152630</link>
      <description>In best judgment assessment, the assessing authority must act honestly and comply with natural justice by disclosing all material proposed to be used against the assessee and giving an effective opportunity to rebut it. Material privately collected by the department cannot lawfully form the basis of an ex parte assessment unless it is first brought to the assessee&#039;s notice. The assessee&#039;s non-cooperation does not remove this obligation, because the authority can still communicate the material and proceed after a fair response opportunity. The HC therefore held the assessment invalid to the extent it rested on undisclosed material.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>