<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 956 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152610</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Original Adjudicating Authority as the Appellants were not afforded sufficient opportunities to defend their position. The lack of proper documentation and limited personal hearing led to the decision to set aside the previous order-in-appeal. The Appellants will now have a fair chance to present their case with the direction for a new hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 11:03:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 956 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152610</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case back to the Original Adjudicating Authority as the Appellants were not afforded sufficient opportunities to defend their position. The lack of proper documentation and limited personal hearing led to the decision to set aside the previous order-in-appeal. The Appellants will now have a fair chance to present their case with the direction for a new hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>