<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 955 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152607</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand against M/s. Rhydburg Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for a stock shortage of raw materials. The penalty under Section 11AC was reduced, and the penalty on the Director was set aside. The company was found liable for penalty under Rule 27 due to improper stock account maintenance. The Department&#039;s allegations of clandestine removal were not substantiated, leading to the modifications in penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2013 10:54:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 955 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152607</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand against M/s. Rhydburg Pharmaceuticals Ltd. for a stock shortage of raw materials. The penalty under Section 11AC was reduced, and the penalty on the Director was set aside. The company was found liable for penalty under Rule 27 due to improper stock account maintenance. The Department&#039;s allegations of clandestine removal were not substantiated, leading to the modifications in penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>