<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (5) TMI 57 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152605</link>
    <description>Article 289 was construed as conferring immunity only from Union taxation directly on a State&#039;s property or income, not from indirect levies connected with import, export, production or manufacture. Customs duties on import or export of State-owned property used outside clause (2) were therefore not barred, because they operate as trade-related imposts rather than direct property taxes. Excise duties on manufacture or production of State property were likewise held outside the constitutional immunity for the same reason. Clause (2) and (3) were read as confirming that State trading activities and related property may be subjected to Union taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (5) TMI 57 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152605</link>
      <description>Article 289 was construed as conferring immunity only from Union taxation directly on a State&#039;s property or income, not from indirect levies connected with import, export, production or manufacture. Customs duties on import or export of State-owned property used outside clause (2) were therefore not barred, because they operate as trade-related imposts rather than direct property taxes. Excise duties on manufacture or production of State property were likewise held outside the constitutional immunity for the same reason. Clause (2) and (3) were read as confirming that State trading activities and related property may be subjected to Union taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152605</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>