https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152594 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the revision in part, upholding the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision on items 2, 4, and 6 covered by valid C forms for concessional tax rates. The excess supply within reasonable margins for items 2 and 4 was deemed part of existing contracts, qualifying for the concessional rate. However, the excess quantity for item 7 lacked contract support and was taxed at the regular rate. Each party was ordered to bear their costs, with an additional advocate's fee of Rs. 200. en-us Mon, 31 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jul 2013 18:10:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152594 The High Court of Andhra Pradesh allowed the revision in part, upholding the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision on items 2, 4, and 6 covered by valid C forms for concessional tax rates. The excess supply within reasonable margins for items 2 and 4 was deemed part of existing contracts, qualifying for the concessional rate. However, the excess quantity for item 7 lacked contract support and was taxed at the regular rate. Each party was ordered to bear their costs, with an additional advocate's fee of Rs. 200. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 31 Oct 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152594