<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 954 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver and stay of recovery concerning duty and penalty demands related to Zinc Dross, ruling in favor of the appellant based on the argument that Zinc Dross was non-excisable waste material, in line with a Supreme Court judgment. Despite the respondent&#039;s reliance on amendments to the CETA Schedule, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s case strong and granted the relief sought.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169602" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 954 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the appellant&#039;s request for waiver and stay of recovery concerning duty and penalty demands related to Zinc Dross, ruling in favor of the appellant based on the argument that Zinc Dross was non-excisable waste material, in line with a Supreme Court judgment. Despite the respondent&#039;s reliance on amendments to the CETA Schedule, the Tribunal found the appellant&#039;s case strong and granted the relief sought.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>