<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 201 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152553</link>
    <description>A sales tax exemption for &quot;fish&quot; was treated as broad enough to cover a processed fish product, because the notification excluded only canned fish and did not limit the term to fresh fish. The product, prepared by boiling, smoking, drying and curing, was commercially different from ordinary dried or salted fish, but it was not excluded merely because it had undergone processing or was in a dead or boiled form. The later clarification that dried and salted fish was exempt supported that wider construction. On that basis, the processed fish product remained within the exemption and was not liable to sales tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 15:06:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 201 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152553</link>
      <description>A sales tax exemption for &quot;fish&quot; was treated as broad enough to cover a processed fish product, because the notification excluded only canned fish and did not limit the term to fresh fish. The product, prepared by boiling, smoking, drying and curing, was commercially different from ordinary dried or salted fish, but it was not excluded merely because it had undergone processing or was in a dead or boiled form. The later clarification that dried and salted fish was exempt supported that wider construction. On that basis, the processed fish product remained within the exemption and was not liable to sales tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>