<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 925 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152551</link>
    <description>The Central Information Commission ordered the disclosure of information requested in an RTI application concerning the 335J register, pending cases, and adjudication orders. The Commission emphasized the importance of transparency in public authority functions and found no justification for withholding the requested details, as they did not compromise any individual&#039;s interests. The Commission criticized the unpreparedness and lack of understanding of RTI Act provisions displayed by the CPIO during the hearing. Although refraining from immediate action, the Commission directed the Chief Commissioner to evaluate and address the CPIO&#039;s conduct appropriately, with a warning for future monitoring.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:54:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 925 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152551</link>
      <description>The Central Information Commission ordered the disclosure of information requested in an RTI application concerning the 335J register, pending cases, and adjudication orders. The Commission emphasized the importance of transparency in public authority functions and found no justification for withholding the requested details, as they did not compromise any individual&#039;s interests. The Commission criticized the unpreparedness and lack of understanding of RTI Act provisions displayed by the CPIO during the hearing. Although refraining from immediate action, the Commission directed the Chief Commissioner to evaluate and address the CPIO&#039;s conduct appropriately, with a warning for future monitoring.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>