<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 995 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152542</link>
    <description>The Appeal was filed against the disallowance of credit, specifically challenging the denial of credit for certain items due to failure to file necessary declarations and seek condonation of delay. The Deputy Commissioner later granted condonation of delay, leading to the setting aside of the denial of credit for the mentioned item. The Appeal was allowed only to that extent, with the Appellants receiving consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:21:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 995 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152542</link>
      <description>The Appeal was filed against the disallowance of credit, specifically challenging the denial of credit for certain items due to failure to file necessary declarations and seek condonation of delay. The Deputy Commissioner later granted condonation of delay, leading to the setting aside of the denial of credit for the mentioned item. The Appeal was allowed only to that extent, with the Appellants receiving consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>