https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152529 The case involved the diversion of imported indigenous raw material by a 100% EOU, leading to significant demands for excise and customs duty, penalties, and confiscation of materials. The appellant raised concerns about the lack of observance of natural justice principles, discrepancies in the manufacturing process, financial difficulties, and non-cooperation with investigating authorities. The judgment emphasized the misdeclaration of goods, involvement of job workers and receivers, and the assessment of liability for penalties and duties. Specific directives were issued regarding pre-deposit amounts and compliance deadlines to protect both the Revenue's interests and the appellants' rights. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:43:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152529 The case involved the diversion of imported indigenous raw material by a 100% EOU, leading to significant demands for excise and customs duty, penalties, and confiscation of materials. The appellant raised concerns about the lack of observance of natural justice principles, discrepancies in the manufacturing process, financial difficulties, and non-cooperation with investigating authorities. The judgment emphasized the misdeclaration of goods, involvement of job workers and receivers, and the assessment of liability for penalties and duties. Specific directives were issued regarding pre-deposit amounts and compliance deadlines to protect both the Revenue's interests and the appellants' rights. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152529