<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 991 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152528</link>
    <description>A modification request cannot be used to secure a review of an earlier remand order. Where the Tribunal had directed retesting of the remnant sample and fresh adjudication after supply of the retest report, the unavailability of that sample did not justify altering the earlier order. The proper course was for the adjudicating authority to pass a fresh decision after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The Tribunal therefore rejected the Revenue&#039;s modification application and directed fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:35:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 991 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152528</link>
      <description>A modification request cannot be used to secure a review of an earlier remand order. Where the Tribunal had directed retesting of the remnant sample and fresh adjudication after supply of the retest report, the unavailability of that sample did not justify altering the earlier order. The proper course was for the adjudicating authority to pass a fresh decision after giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. The Tribunal therefore rejected the Revenue&#039;s modification application and directed fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>