https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152526 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision, rejecting the Revenue's appeal regarding duty demand for Beta Blue Pigments. The case lacked substantial evidence supporting clandestine removal, with discrepancies noted in stock quantities and operator notebooks. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's analysis comprehensive, emphasizing the insufficiency of evidence presented by the Revenue. Appeals were dismissed, affirming the initial decision. en-us Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:23:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152526 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision, rejecting the Revenue's appeal regarding duty demand for Beta Blue Pigments. The case lacked substantial evidence supporting clandestine removal, with discrepancies noted in stock quantities and operator notebooks. The Tribunal found the Commissioner's analysis comprehensive, emphasizing the insufficiency of evidence presented by the Revenue. Appeals were dismissed, affirming the initial decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152526