https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152524 The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of the appeal (No. 968 of 2008) after considering the delayed compliance with the pre-deposit order. Despite acknowledging that delayed deposit alone does not warrant restoration, the Tribunal noted the compliance by the Directors with the deposit requirement within the specified time and the difficulties faced by the company in making the deposit on time. Consequently, the order dated 16-9-2008 was recalled, and the appeal was restored, to be listed for hearing with other related appeals. en-us Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jul 2013 11:43:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152524 The Tribunal allowed the application for restoration of the appeal (No. 968 of 2008) after considering the delayed compliance with the pre-deposit order. Despite acknowledging that delayed deposit alone does not warrant restoration, the Tribunal noted the compliance by the Directors with the deposit requirement within the specified time and the difficulties faced by the company in making the deposit on time. Consequently, the order dated 16-9-2008 was recalled, and the appeal was restored, to be listed for hearing with other related appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152524