<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 205 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152512</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Schedule D of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, as applied to Haryana. It dismissed the writ petitions challenging the amendment made by Haryana Act No. 10 of 1970 regarding the stage of levy for tax on cotton. The court rejected allegations of discrimination between imported cotton and cotton produced in Haryana, emphasizing the uniform tax rate for both types of cotton as a key factor in the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 17:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169550" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 205 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152512</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutional validity of Schedule D of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948, as applied to Haryana. It dismissed the writ petitions challenging the amendment made by Haryana Act No. 10 of 1970 regarding the stage of levy for tax on cotton. The court rejected allegations of discrimination between imported cotton and cotton produced in Haryana, emphasizing the uniform tax rate for both types of cotton as a key factor in the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152512</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>