<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 718 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152507</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned orders and allowed the writ petition. The respondents were directed to furnish the correct address of the retired Sub-Post Master to the petitioner within thirty days. The court emphasized the importance of transparency and public interest under the RTI Act, ruling that the information sought was necessary for the execution of a legal decree and could not be denied on privacy grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 12:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 718 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152507</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned orders and allowed the writ petition. The respondents were directed to furnish the correct address of the retired Sub-Post Master to the petitioner within thirty days. The court emphasized the importance of transparency and public interest under the RTI Act, ruling that the information sought was necessary for the execution of a legal decree and could not be denied on privacy grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>