https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152498 A limited closure of a municipal slaughter house on seven specified days was upheld as a reasonable restriction on the right to trade under Article 19(1)(g), because the regulatory measure was not a total ban, was linked to recognised occasions, and served public interest and municipal welfare. The Court also held that the standing orders did not offend Article 14, since the classification between butchers dealing in cattle and those dealing in sheep and goat rested on intelligible differentia and had a rational nexus with the object of livestock preservation. The impugned standing orders were therefore constitutionally valid. en-us Thu, 17 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 May 2014 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152498 A limited closure of a municipal slaughter house on seven specified days was upheld as a reasonable restriction on the right to trade under Article 19(1)(g), because the regulatory measure was not a total ban, was linked to recognised occasions, and served public interest and municipal welfare. The Court also held that the standing orders did not offend Article 14, since the classification between butchers dealing in cattle and those dealing in sheep and goat rested on intelligible differentia and had a rational nexus with the object of livestock preservation. The impugned standing orders were therefore constitutionally valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152498