<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 997 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152494</link>
    <description>The waiver of penalty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was upheld by the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority. The authorities found no evidence of clandestine removal of goods and noted the assessee&#039;s cooperation in discharging duty liability. Since there was no finding of mala fide intent by the assessee, the waiver of penalty was maintained, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 15:25:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 997 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152494</link>
      <description>The waiver of penalty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was upheld by the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority. The authorities found no evidence of clandestine removal of goods and noted the assessee&#039;s cooperation in discharging duty liability. Since there was no finding of mala fide intent by the assessee, the waiver of penalty was maintained, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>