<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (10) TMI 139 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152478</link>
    <description>The doctrine of merger applies where a superior authority disposes of the same subject-matter in appeal or revision, with the result that the inferior order loses independent existence to that extent. The Tribunal&#039;s revisional order was treated as the operative order even though it did not expressly discuss every component of the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order. On that basis, the Commissioner could not reopen the same matter under section 24(4) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, because the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order had merged in the Tribunal&#039;s order. The revisional power was therefore unavailable against the merged order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 18:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (10) TMI 139 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152478</link>
      <description>The doctrine of merger applies where a superior authority disposes of the same subject-matter in appeal or revision, with the result that the inferior order loses independent existence to that extent. The Tribunal&#039;s revisional order was treated as the operative order even though it did not expressly discuss every component of the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order. On that basis, the Commissioner could not reopen the same matter under section 24(4) of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947, because the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s order had merged in the Tribunal&#039;s order. The revisional power was therefore unavailable against the merged order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>