<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 987 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152470</link>
    <description>The judgment ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the CPIO to provide the requested information within a specified timeframe. It was held that the exemption under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act does not apply in cases where investigations are completed, emphasizing that the CBI cannot be considered a fiduciary in such situations. The decision set aside the denial of information under Section 8(1)(e) and emphasized the importance of providing information in cases involving corruption complaints.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 14:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 987 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152470</link>
      <description>The judgment ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the CPIO to provide the requested information within a specified timeframe. It was held that the exemption under Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act does not apply in cases where investigations are completed, emphasizing that the CBI cannot be considered a fiduciary in such situations. The decision set aside the denial of information under Section 8(1)(e) and emphasized the importance of providing information in cases involving corruption complaints.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152470</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>