<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (12) TMI 159 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152440</link>
    <description>The term &quot;miller&quot; in item 6 of the Third Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was construed in its ordinary sense because it was not defined in the Act. It refers to a person who owns or works a mill, either as proprietor or tenant, and the phrase &quot;other than a decorticating miller&quot; reinforced that the entry targets a person functioning as a miller rather than one who merely uses milling facilities occasionally. On that interpretation, a person who only gets groundnuts crushed in another mill for individual transactions is not a miller. The assessee was therefore not liable to assessment on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 16:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (12) TMI 159 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152440</link>
      <description>The term &quot;miller&quot; in item 6 of the Third Schedule to the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act was construed in its ordinary sense because it was not defined in the Act. It refers to a person who owns or works a mill, either as proprietor or tenant, and the phrase &quot;other than a decorticating miller&quot; reinforced that the entry targets a person functioning as a miller rather than one who merely uses milling facilities occasionally. On that interpretation, a person who only gets groundnuts crushed in another mill for individual transactions is not a miller. The assessee was therefore not liable to assessment on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>