<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 195 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152431</link>
    <description>The revising authority&#039;s decision to reject the account books and estimate a higher turnover for the assessment year 1971-72 was challenged by the assessee. The rejection was based on discrepancies in the account books revealed during a survey, leading to suspicions about their genuineness. The estimate of turnover was deemed unreasonable, relying on the assessee&#039;s conduct in subsequent years and lacking a reasonable basis. The judgment emphasized the need for independent assessments each year and reasonable judgment by the assessing authority. Consequently, the revision was allowed, directing a reassessment of turnover in accordance with the law and observations in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 15:02:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169469" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 195 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152431</link>
      <description>The revising authority&#039;s decision to reject the account books and estimate a higher turnover for the assessment year 1971-72 was challenged by the assessee. The rejection was based on discrepancies in the account books revealed during a survey, leading to suspicions about their genuineness. The estimate of turnover was deemed unreasonable, relying on the assessee&#039;s conduct in subsequent years and lacking a reasonable basis. The judgment emphasized the need for independent assessments each year and reasonable judgment by the assessing authority. Consequently, the revision was allowed, directing a reassessment of turnover in accordance with the law and observations in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>