<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 736 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the Registry of CESTAT to adhere strictly to the guidelines set by the Apex Court and the High Court of Delhi regarding the scrutiny of vakalatnama to ensure proper representation of litigants. Specific directions were issued for thorough scrutiny, guidance to branches, immediate defect notification, and upholding judicial discipline. The appeal was disposed of as no further cause of action existed, with the appellant expressing satisfaction with the outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 12:04:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 736 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the Registry of CESTAT to adhere strictly to the guidelines set by the Apex Court and the High Court of Delhi regarding the scrutiny of vakalatnama to ensure proper representation of litigants. Specific directions were issued for thorough scrutiny, guidance to branches, immediate defect notification, and upholding judicial discipline. The appeal was disposed of as no further cause of action existed, with the appellant expressing satisfaction with the outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>