<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 713 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152413</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that Section 4A valuation was applicable for supplies made under DGS&amp;amp;D contracts. The decision emphasized the distinction between bulk sales and retail sales to different departments, providing clarity on valuation methods based on established precedents. This ruling ensures consistency and compliance with the law in resolving disputes related to valuation under such contractual arrangements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 713 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152413</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Appellant&#039;s appeal, holding that Section 4A valuation was applicable for supplies made under DGS&amp;amp;D contracts. The decision emphasized the distinction between bulk sales and retail sales to different departments, providing clarity on valuation methods based on established precedents. This ruling ensures consistency and compliance with the law in resolving disputes related to valuation under such contractual arrangements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>