<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (2) TMI 200 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152408</link>
    <description>Refund of excess sales tax on reassessment becomes enforceable once the statutory conditions are met, because section 12 creates a mandatory duty to refund amounts paid in excess of the sum due. The &quot;amount due&quot; is the liability as determined on reassessment, and the refund mechanism under the rules gives the dealer a vested claim when the refund application is made and the prescribed notices are issued. Pending suo motu revision proceedings under the Act do not make finality of all possible revision a condition precedent to refund, so the authority cannot withhold repayment merely because revision has been initiated or remains pending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:25:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (2) TMI 200 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152408</link>
      <description>Refund of excess sales tax on reassessment becomes enforceable once the statutory conditions are met, because section 12 creates a mandatory duty to refund amounts paid in excess of the sum due. The &quot;amount due&quot; is the liability as determined on reassessment, and the refund mechanism under the rules gives the dealer a vested claim when the refund application is made and the prescribed notices are issued. Pending suo motu revision proceedings under the Act do not make finality of all possible revision a condition precedent to refund, so the authority cannot withhold repayment merely because revision has been initiated or remains pending.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>