https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152407 Writ review under Article 226 is unsuitable for disputed lease forfeiture issues turning on contested facts and lease covenant construction, so the challenge to cancellation could not be examined in the manner pursued. Even so, the State cannot resume possession by force or self-help after purported cancellation and must act according to law. Development permission under the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act may be revoked where the grant is tainted by fraud, misrepresentation, or breach of conditions, but cancellation must comply with natural justice; vague or mixed allegations require precise notice and a fair hearing. en-us Tue, 17 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152407 Writ review under Article 226 is unsuitable for disputed lease forfeiture issues turning on contested facts and lease covenant construction, so the challenge to cancellation could not be examined in the manner pursued. Even so, the State cannot resume possession by force or self-help after purported cancellation and must act according to law. Development permission under the U.P. Urban Planning and Development Act may be revoked where the grant is tainted by fraud, misrepresentation, or breach of conditions, but cancellation must comply with natural justice; vague or mixed allegations require precise notice and a fair hearing. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 17 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152407