<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 672 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152398</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case involving the interpretation of Notification No. 52/2003-Cus regarding Customs Duty, Penalty, and Redemption fine. The appellant imported machineries under the EOU scheme for manufacturing components and export. Despite arguments from the departmental representative, the Tribunal determined that the machineries were likely put to use within bonded premises, ordering a waiver of all demanded dues until the appeal&#039;s resolution, emphasizing the avoidance of coercive measures during this period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:21:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 672 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152398</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a 100% EOU, in a case involving the interpretation of Notification No. 52/2003-Cus regarding Customs Duty, Penalty, and Redemption fine. The appellant imported machineries under the EOU scheme for manufacturing components and export. Despite arguments from the departmental representative, the Tribunal determined that the machineries were likely put to use within bonded premises, ordering a waiver of all demanded dues until the appeal&#039;s resolution, emphasizing the avoidance of coercive measures during this period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>