https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152396 The Tribunal upheld the differential duty demand but set aside the confiscation, fine, and penalty in a case concerning the admissibility of benefit under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. The Tribunal found no misdeclaration of goods and no mala fide intent, leading to the decision to set aside the confiscation of goods under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. Additionally, the penalty imposed on the importer was also set aside based on the lack of mala fide actions. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:19:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152396 The Tribunal upheld the differential duty demand but set aside the confiscation, fine, and penalty in a case concerning the admissibility of benefit under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. The Tribunal found no misdeclaration of goods and no mala fide intent, leading to the decision to set aside the confiscation of goods under Section 111(m) of the Customs Act, 1962. Additionally, the penalty imposed on the importer was also set aside based on the lack of mala fide actions. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152396