<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 729 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152388</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the claim for refund of Rs. 10,43,190, finding it was not barred by unjust enrichment based on evidentiary materials, including a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s application for a stay of the impugned order, noting the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment and the department&#039;s retention of the refund amount for an extended period. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was grounded in the examination of evidence and legal principles, ultimately denying the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 15:20:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 729 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152388</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the claim for refund of Rs. 10,43,190, finding it was not barred by unjust enrichment based on evidentiary materials, including a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate. The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s application for a stay of the impugned order, noting the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment and the department&#039;s retention of the refund amount for an extended period. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was grounded in the examination of evidence and legal principles, ultimately denying the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>