<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 947 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152385</link>
    <description>Information relating to the functioning of a public authority, including orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, reserved-but-unpronounced cases, despatch registers and cause lists, was treated as disclosable under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Denial on the ground that the requester had not shown public interest was found unjustified where no specific exemption was established. The requested orders and case-management records were directed to be furnished, and the cause lists were to be made available for inspection. A centralized, publicly accessible record of such case-related information was also advised to facilitate scrutiny.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 14:56:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 947 - CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152385</link>
      <description>Information relating to the functioning of a public authority, including orders of the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, reserved-but-unpronounced cases, despatch registers and cause lists, was treated as disclosable under the Right to Information Act, 2005. Denial on the ground that the requester had not shown public interest was found unjustified where no specific exemption was established. The requested orders and case-management records were directed to be furnished, and the cause lists were to be made available for inspection. A centralized, publicly accessible record of such case-related information was also advised to facilitate scrutiny.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>