<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 706 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152344</link>
    <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was found unsustainable where credit was taken with intimation to the department, remained frozen at the department&#039;s instance, and was never utilised for duty payment. The lower appellate authority noted that the reversal was made under protest after the show-cause notices and that there was no concealment or deliberate and wilful defiance of law. The original authority had imposed penalty without citing the penal provision or addressing these facts, so the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 17:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 706 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152344</link>
      <description>Penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was found unsustainable where credit was taken with intimation to the department, remained frozen at the department&#039;s instance, and was never utilised for duty payment. The lower appellate authority noted that the reversal was made under protest after the show-cause notices and that there was no concealment or deliberate and wilful defiance of law. The original authority had imposed penalty without citing the penal provision or addressing these facts, so the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order was upheld and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152344</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>