<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 226 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152338</link>
    <description>Where a statutory declaration form has been filed before assessment and accepted by the assessing authority, a clerical omission does not justify rejection without first giving the dealer a reasonable opportunity to cure the defect. The Court distinguished cases where the declaration was never produced at the assessment stage, and held that those authorities did not apply here because the C form had already been accepted, with only the date of issue omitted. The governing rule requiring an opportunity to remove defects supported the Board&#039;s direction to allow rectification, and the reference was answered in the affirmative.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:28:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 226 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152338</link>
      <description>Where a statutory declaration form has been filed before assessment and accepted by the assessing authority, a clerical omission does not justify rejection without first giving the dealer a reasonable opportunity to cure the defect. The Court distinguished cases where the declaration was never produced at the assessment stage, and held that those authorities did not apply here because the C form had already been accepted, with only the date of issue omitted. The governing rule requiring an opportunity to remove defects supported the Board&#039;s direction to allow rectification, and the reference was answered in the affirmative.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>