<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 724 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the recovery of Central Excise duty and Education Cess against the appellant for the period in question. It set aside the daily interest rate but upheld the interest at 13% per annum. The penalty under Rule 25 was reduced due to financial hardships, and penalties under Rule 27 were set aside. The appellant was directed to pay the upheld interest and reduced penalty within 30 days from the order date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 14:10:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 724 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the recovery of Central Excise duty and Education Cess against the appellant for the period in question. It set aside the daily interest rate but upheld the interest at 13% per annum. The penalty under Rule 25 was reduced due to financial hardships, and penalties under Rule 27 were set aside. The appellant was directed to pay the upheld interest and reduced penalty within 30 days from the order date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>