<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 841 - KOLKATA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152315</link>
    <description>Addition under Section 68 concerning unexplained cash credit turned on whether documentary materials proved identity of creditors and linkage to future sales. The appellate fact finding that confirmatory statements, invoices, challans and vouchers established advances against supply was binding and should not have been ignored; the tribunals reliance on an unrelated order-sheet entry without addressing this evidence was improper. Consequentially the tribunals order was set aside and the appeal allowed, reaffirming that documentary proof of transactions can discharge the requirement to identify creditors and show bona fide receipt of cash credits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 11:56:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 841 - KOLKATA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152315</link>
      <description>Addition under Section 68 concerning unexplained cash credit turned on whether documentary materials proved identity of creditors and linkage to future sales. The appellate fact finding that confirmatory statements, invoices, challans and vouchers established advances against supply was binding and should not have been ignored; the tribunals reliance on an unrelated order-sheet entry without addressing this evidence was improper. Consequentially the tribunals order was set aside and the appeal allowed, reaffirming that documentary proof of transactions can discharge the requirement to identify creditors and show bona fide receipt of cash credits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>