<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 822 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing correction of clerical errors under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962. It ruled that such errors could be rectified without filing an appeal against the assessment order. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s stay petition challenging the refund claim rejection was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:16:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 822 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing correction of clerical errors under Section 154 of the Customs Act, 1962. It ruled that such errors could be rectified without filing an appeal against the assessment order. Consequently, the Revenue&#039;s stay petition challenging the refund claim rejection was dismissed for lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>