<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 1019 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152298</link>
    <description>Imported chocolate confectionery tested positive for melamine and was found unfit for human consumption, leading to a prima facie view that the goods breached import restrictions and food safety standards and were liable to confiscation and penalty. At the interim stage, the Tribunal accepted the laboratory report as credible and found no material to discredit it. It therefore declined complete waiver of pre-deposit, but exercised discretion to direct only a partial deposit as a condition for hearing the appeal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:03:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 1019 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152298</link>
      <description>Imported chocolate confectionery tested positive for melamine and was found unfit for human consumption, leading to a prima facie view that the goods breached import restrictions and food safety standards and were liable to confiscation and penalty. At the interim stage, the Tribunal accepted the laboratory report as credible and found no material to discredit it. It therefore declined complete waiver of pre-deposit, but exercised discretion to direct only a partial deposit as a condition for hearing the appeal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>