https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152295 The court affirmed the lower court's decision, ruling in favor of the plaintiff and holding that the defendant was liable to pay the sales tax as claimed. The court emphasized the clear provisions in the contract regarding sales tax reimbursement and rejected the defendant's argument that the contract fell under a works contract exempt from sales tax. The defendant was ordered to reimburse the plaintiff for the sales tax paid, dismissing the appeal and requiring the defendant to cover the costs. en-us Mon, 11 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:52:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152295 The court affirmed the lower court's decision, ruling in favor of the plaintiff and holding that the defendant was liable to pay the sales tax as claimed. The court emphasized the clear provisions in the contract regarding sales tax reimbursement and rejected the defendant's argument that the contract fell under a works contract exempt from sales tax. The defendant was ordered to reimburse the plaintiff for the sales tax paid, dismissing the appeal and requiring the defendant to cover the costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 11 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152295