<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 224 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152293</link>
    <description>Rice bran (kana) was treated as cattle fodder for purposes of a sales tax exemption notification because its ordinary and predominant use in common parlance was feeding cattle. The fact that a small portion was also used for oil extraction did not change its essential character or classification under the notification. On that basis, the commodity fell within the exempted category, and the assessee was entitled to exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:45:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 224 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152293</link>
      <description>Rice bran (kana) was treated as cattle fodder for purposes of a sales tax exemption notification because its ordinary and predominant use in common parlance was feeding cattle. The fact that a small portion was also used for oil extraction did not change its essential character or classification under the notification. On that basis, the commodity fell within the exempted category, and the assessee was entitled to exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>