https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152279 A constitutional challenge to sections 8(1), 8(2), 8(2A), 9(2) and 9(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was rejected because binding Supreme Court rulings had already upheld the relevant provisions, and a Full Bench had sustained the validity of section 8 as a whole. In light of those precedents, the High Court held that no independent merit remained in the petitions and the vires challenge failed. en-us Fri, 21 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:54:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152279 A constitutional challenge to sections 8(1), 8(2), 8(2A), 9(2) and 9(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 was rejected because binding Supreme Court rulings had already upheld the relevant provisions, and a Full Bench had sustained the validity of section 8 as a whole. In light of those precedents, the High Court held that no independent merit remained in the petitions and the vires challenge failed. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 21 Jul 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152279