<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 812 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152263</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that appellate Commissioners should not entertain appeals against intradepartmental notings or correspondence, emphasizing that such notings are not appealable orders. It was deemed illegal and unjudicial to treat such notings as appeals. The Tribunal criticized the practice and allowed the appeal, directing the Assistant Commissioner of Customs to address the issue promptly. The respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption from CVD payment on imported goods under DFIAs was reiterated, urging the authority to consider deletion of payment endorsements for justice. The stay application was disposed of, highlighting the need for a prompt resolution of the substantive issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:32:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 812 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152263</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that appellate Commissioners should not entertain appeals against intradepartmental notings or correspondence, emphasizing that such notings are not appealable orders. It was deemed illegal and unjudicial to treat such notings as appeals. The Tribunal criticized the practice and allowed the appeal, directing the Assistant Commissioner of Customs to address the issue promptly. The respondent&#039;s entitlement to exemption from CVD payment on imported goods under DFIAs was reiterated, urging the authority to consider deletion of payment endorsements for justice. The stay application was disposed of, highlighting the need for a prompt resolution of the substantive issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>