<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 807 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld a demand under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the appellants for recovering additional amounts through commercial invoices, requiring them to reverse Cenvat credit on total sale proceeds. The Tribunal held the appellants liable to pay duty on the recovered amount, dismissing their appeal and emphasizing their duty liability. The imposition of penalties and interest was also upheld, with the judgment finding no fault in the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2017 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 807 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld a demand under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the appellants for recovering additional amounts through commercial invoices, requiring them to reverse Cenvat credit on total sale proceeds. The Tribunal held the appellants liable to pay duty on the recovered amount, dismissing their appeal and emphasizing their duty liability. The imposition of penalties and interest was also upheld, with the judgment finding no fault in the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>